Loading Bonafide Research

North America Blood Collection Devices Market Outlook, 2031

The North America Blood Collection Devices Market is segmented into By Product Type (Blood Collection Tubes, Needles & Syringes, Blood Bags, Blood Collection Systems/Monitors, Lancets, Others); By End-User (Hospitals and ASCs, Diagnostics and Pathology Laboratories, Blood Banks, Others); By Application (Diagnostic Application, Therapeutic Application); By Method (Manual, Automated).

The North America Blood Collection Devices Market is expected to reach a market size of more than 5.29 Billion by 2031, driven by expanding healthcare infrastructure.

Blood Collection Devices Market Analysis

The North American blood collection devices market encompasses specialized medical tools including blood collection tubes, needles, lancets, blood bags, and automated collection systems used by clinicians to extract and preserve blood for diagnostic or therapeutic processing. Holding the largest global market share, North America's dominance is vital to modern medical infrastructure, directly supporting routine check-ups, acute inpatient care, donor phlebotomy, and specialized clinical trials. The market's high relevance lies in its foundational role in diagnostic medicine; accurate lab results depend on standardized, safe blood extraction. Robust market growth is primarily driven by the rising prevalence of chronic conditions like cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer, an aging population, expanding adoption of point-of-care testing, and ongoing shifts toward micro-sampling and automated systems that minimize patient discomfort and contamination risks. Industry dynamics are heavily shaped by key professional associations such as the American Association of Blood Banks (AABB), the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), and the American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP). These organizations establish standard operating procedures for venipuncture, publish quality control guidelines for blood handling, sponsor continuing clinical education, and accredit facilities to elevate biosafety and specimen integrity. Together with regulatory mandates from the U.S. FDA, these industry groups influence product development encouraging manufacturers to introduce safety-engineered devices that protect healthcare workers from needle-stick injuries while accelerating laboratory processing times across North America. According to the research report, "North America Blood Collection Devices Market Outlook, 2031," published by Bonafide Research, the North America Blood Collection Devices Market is expected to reach a market size of more than 5.29 Billion by 2031. The North American blood collection devices market is a highly consolidated sector led by industry giants including Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD), Terumo Corporation, Cardinal Health, Greiner Bio-One, and Sarstedt. Valued globally at over billion with North America commanding the largest regional share, the market is shaped by key technological developments. A notable milestone includes the U.S. FDA approval of Terumo’s Rika Plasma Donation System featuring the iNomi Nomogram, which automates collection volumes based on individual donor bio-metrics. Strategic opportunities are expanding rapidly in needle-free micro-sampling, capillary devices, and point-of-care testing systems, catering to the surge in home-based clinical diagnostics and remote patient monitoring. The supply chain relies heavily on raw materials like medical-grade plastics, specialty rubbers, and stainless steel, which flow from specialized material suppliers to precision manufacturers. These components undergo sterile assembly and rigorous regulatory oversight before moving through healthcare distributors such as Medline and Cardinal Health to end users including hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, independent clinical laboratories, and blood banks. However, supply chain vulnerabilities exist; raw material cost volatility, rubber/plastic availability bottlenecks, and stringent transport cold-chain requirements for delicate additive tubes present ongoing logistics challenges for regional manufacturers.

What's Inside a Bonafide Research`s industry report?

A Bonafide Research industry report provides in-depth market analysis, trends, competitive insights, and strategic recommendations to help businesses make informed decisions.

Download Sample

Market Dynamics

Market Drivers

Rising burden of chronic diseases and expanding diagnostic screening volume: The primary growth engine for the North American market is the high prevalence of chronic conditions requiring routine monitoring, including diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, kidney disorders, and various cancers. Clinical management of these diseases heavily relies on frequent blood draws to perform complete blood counts (CBCs), metabolic panels, lipid profiles, and biomarker evaluations. Additionally, North America’s aging demographic amplifies healthcare utilization, as older populations naturally experience higher co-morbidity rates requiring chronic disease tracking and preventive screening programs.
Stringent occupational safety standards and mandates for safety-engineered devices: Regulatory enforcement and workplace safety policies across North America drive high demand for premium, safety-engineered collection devices. Governing frameworks like the U.S. Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act (enforced by OSHA) compel healthcare facilities to adopt blood collection products that feature engineered sharps injury protections. Facilities must utilize safety needles with active/passive shielding mechanisms, self-retracting lancets, and closed evacuated tube systems to minimize the risk of accidental needle-stick injuries and exposure to blood-borne pathogens (such as HIV, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C).

Market Challenges

Persistent shortage of skilled healthcare workers and phlebotomists: A critical operational bottleneck facing the North American market is the ongoing structural shortage of certified phlebotomists, clinical laboratory technicians, and specialized nurses. High rates of occupational burnout, coupled with retirement backlogs and training bottlenecks, have left many hospital networks, outpatient laboratories, and blood donation centers short-staffed. This labor deficit directly restricts sample throughput and can lead to increased procedural errors such as incorrect blood-to-additive ratios, hemolyzed samples, or improper patient identification which ultimately results in high rate of sample rejection, delayed diagnoses, and wasted medical consumables.
Pre-analytical errors, sample contamination, and vulnerable supply chains: Despite advances in device safety, the pre-analytical phase of testing remains highly susceptible to operational failure. Challenges such as sample hemolysis, micro-clotting, improper collection tube mixing, and environmental exposure during transport frequently compromise specimen integrity. Beyond sampling errors, the North American industry faces ongoing supply chain vulnerabilities. Manufacturing relies on precision-grade raw materials such as medical polymers, specialty rubbers for stoppers, and high-purity stainless steel which remain susceptible to global supply disruptions, inflationary pressures, and transport cold-chain constraints required for specialized additive tubes.

Market Trends

Rapid shift toward micro-sampling, capillary blood collection, and home-based diagnostics: Traditional venipuncture which extracts multi-milliliter blood samples from veins using standard vacuum tubes is increasingly supplemented by micro-sampling and capillary collection technology. Micro-sampling systems (such as upper-arm push-button devices, volume-exact capillary tubes, and dried blood spot cards) allow the collection of small microliter volumes from a single, painless skin puncture. Driven by the growth of decentralized clinical trials, home testing, and telemedicine platforms, these minimally invasive tools enable self-collection or easy administration by non-specialist care providers, reducing patient discomfort while maintaining lab-quality analytical precision.
Accelerating adoption of automated and smart blood collection systems: High-volume environments like donor centers and central diagnostic reference labs are aggressively adopting automated technologies to overcome labor constraints and streamline workflow efficiency. In blood donation and plasma collection, automated apheresis and smart donation platforms dynamically optimize collection volumes based on individual donor biometrics, dramatically reducing draw cycle times and improving donor safety. Simultaneously, the market is seeing integration of smart sample tracking consumables equipped with RFID tags and 2D barcode identification.

Make this report your own

Have queries/questions regarding a report

Take advantage of intelligence tailored to your business objective

Sikandar Kesari

Sikandar Kesari

Research Analyst


Blood Collection Devices Segmentation

By Product TypeBlood Collection Tubes
Needles & Syringes
Blood Bags
Blood Collection Systems/Monitors
Lancets
Others
By End-UserHospitals and ASCs
Diagnostics and Pathology Laboratories
Blood Banks
Others
By ApplicationDiagnostic Application
Therapeutic Application
By MethodManual
Automated
North AmericaUnited States
Canada
Mexico

Blood collection tubes are the largest product-type segment because they are the standard, test-specific containers used to collect, preserve, transport, and prepare blood specimens for a broad range of routine clinical laboratory tests. Blood collection tubes occupy a central position in the blood collection process because the specimen collected from a patient generally needs to remain suitable for laboratory analysis from the moment of venipuncture through processing and testing. Unlike a needle or holder, which primarily facilitates the collection step, a tube directly determines the type and condition of specimen available to the laboratory. Different tubes are manufactured with specific additives, anticoagulants, clot activators, or serum-separation materials so that the collected blood can be used as whole blood, plasma, or serum for different examinations. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recognizes blood collection tubes as medical devices and specifically identifies standards covering tubes and additives for serum, plasma, and whole-blood testing. FDA-recognized guidance also addresses validation of tube performance because collection and specimen handling can affect the accuracy and precision of laboratory results. This broad compatibility is a major reason tubes are used across hematology, clinical chemistry, coagulation, immunology, molecular testing, blood banking, and microbiology workflows. For example, EDTA tubes are used to prevent coagulation and preserve whole-blood specimens for hematology-related testing, while citrate, heparin, serum, and serum-separation tubes serve different analytical requirements. FDA documentation identifies EDTA, sodium heparin, sodium citrate, and ACD as anticoagulants used for venous whole-blood collection, demonstrating how tube selection is linked to the intended test. Tubes also support closed-system collection, transport, and processing, which helps standardize specimen handling and reduce unnecessary transfers. FDA records describe evacuated tubes as devices used to collect, transport, and process blood for serum, plasma, or whole-blood testing. Hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers are the largest end-user segment because these facilities perform large volumes of clinical procedures and depend on blood specimens for diagnosis, patient assessment, treatment decisions, and perioperative care. Hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers have a particularly strong need for blood collection devices because blood sampling is integrated into numerous stages of patient care rather than being limited to a single specialty. Hospitals routinely collect specimens from emergency, inpatient, intensive-care, surgical, oncology, cardiology, infectious-disease, and other departments, creating continuous demand for standardized collection supplies. The diagnostic process described by the CDC includes ordering the appropriate test, collecting and transporting the specimen, laboratory analysis, reporting, and clinical interpretation, meaning blood collection is an essential pre-analytic step rather than an isolated procedure. Hospital-based testing can be used to establish diagnoses, evaluate physiological status, monitor response to therapy, identify infection, assess organ function, and guide treatment decisions. CDC guidance specifically emphasizes that laboratory testing plays an important role in diagnosis and that appropriate specimen collection and handling are necessary for reliable results. The scale and diversity of hospital operations reinforce the use of blood collection devices because the same facility may require EDTA tubes for hematology, citrate tubes for coagulation, serum or plasma tubes for chemistry and immunology, and specialized blood culture systems for suspected bloodstream infection. CDC guidance on adult blood cultures notes that adequate blood volume and collection of multiple sets are important for laboratory diagnosis of bloodstream infections. Ambulatory surgery centers also contribute because patients undergoing procedures may require preoperative assessment, laboratory evaluation, blood typing or other testing depending on the procedure and clinical circumstances. Diagnostic applications are the largest application segment because blood specimens are routinely required to identify, evaluate, differentiate, and monitor a wide range of diseases and clinical conditions. The dominance of diagnostic applications is closely connected to the fundamental role of laboratory testing in determining what is happening inside a patient's body and supporting clinical decisions. Blood is a highly information-rich specimen because it can provide measurable indicators of hematological status, organ function, metabolic processes, inflammation, infection, coagulation, immune activity, and numerous other physiological or pathological conditions. Consequently, blood collection devices are used at the beginning of many diagnostic pathways, with the collected specimen subsequently undergoing laboratory analysis. The CDC describes the clinical laboratory as an important component of healthcare delivery and notes that laboratory testing informs the majority of diagnoses, making appropriate specimen collection a critical part of diagnostic accuracy. Blood collection is therefore not merely a preparatory activity; the quality, type, volume, and handling of the specimen can influence whether the laboratory can perform the intended test correctly. FDA-recognized standards specifically address venous and capillary blood collection tubes, additives, and the validation of tube performance for serum, plasma, and whole-blood testing. Diagnostic applications also span conventional and specialized laboratory disciplines. A single healthcare encounter may involve a complete blood count, electrolyte testing, liver or kidney function assessment, coagulation testing, infectious-disease testing, hormone analysis, immunological testing, or molecular examination, with each test potentially requiring a particular specimen type or collection tube. CDC diagnostic-excellence guidance explains that the diagnostic process involves collecting and transporting specimens before laboratory testing and interpretation, while emphasizing that appropriate testing and specimen handling are important for avoiding missed, delayed, or incorrect diagnoses. Manual blood collection is the largest method segment because venipuncture and capillary collection performed by trained healthcare personnel remain the established foundation for obtaining blood specimens in routine clinical practice. Manual collection remains highly relevant because obtaining a blood specimen still commonly requires a healthcare professional to identify an appropriate collection site, prepare the patient, insert the collection device, control blood flow, select the correct tube, and ensure that the specimen is collected and handled according to the requirements of the intended test. Even when healthcare facilities use evacuated tubes, safety needles, tube holders, analyzers, barcode systems, and automated laboratory instruments, the initial act of obtaining the specimen continues to depend heavily on human-operated collection procedures. FDA specimen-collection guidance explicitly describes venipuncture as a standard method for collecting whole-blood specimens and identifies different anticoagulant-containing tubes used according to testing requirements. FDA-recognized CLSI guidance also establishes criteria for suitable venous blood specimen collection for clinical laboratory testing in both outpatient and inpatient settings, demonstrating that conventional venous collection remains an important standardized procedure across healthcare environments. Manual collection also offers flexibility because healthcare professionals can adapt the procedure to patient anatomy, age, clinical condition, specimen requirements, and collection location. This is particularly important when patients have difficult veins, require multiple specimen types, or need capillary rather than venous sampling. Manual techniques can also be used across hospitals, physician offices, outpatient facilities, emergency departments, laboratories, and other healthcare settings without requiring a complex automated collection platform.

Blood Collection Devices Market Regional Insights

The United States is the largest country-level segment in the North American blood collection devices market because its extensive healthcare infrastructure, large clinical laboratory network, high level of healthcare utilization, and strong diagnostic capacity generate broad and recurring demand for blood specimen collection. The United States has structural characteristics that support a particularly large requirement for blood collection devices across North America. Its healthcare system includes a very large network of hospitals, physician practices, outpatient facilities, diagnostic laboratories, emergency departments, surgical facilities, and specialty-care centers, all of which can require blood specimens for clinical decision-making. The American Hospital Association reported 6,093 hospitals in its 2026 Fast Facts publication, illustrating the breadth of hospital infrastructure across the country. The U.S. also has an extensive regulated clinical laboratory environment. CMS data for the first quarter of 2026 listed more than 302,000 active or certified clinical laboratory providers under the CLIA framework, showing the enormous number of locations involved in human-specimen testing. CLIA applies to U.S. facilities that test human specimens for health assessment or for diagnosing, preventing, or treating disease, creating a nationwide framework for laboratory quality and testing practices. The U.S. healthcare system also places substantial emphasis on laboratory-supported diagnosis. CDC guidance states that clinical laboratory testing informs the majority of diagnoses and identifies specimen collection as an essential part of the total testing process. Blood collection devices consequently serve a wide variety of U.S. applications, from routine hematology and chemistry testing to coagulation studies, blood cultures, immunology, molecular diagnostics, and preoperative assessment.

Don't pay for what you don't need. Save 30%

Customise your report by selecting specific countries or regions

Specify Scope Now
Discount offer

Companies Mentioned

  • Medline Industries, LP
  • Beckton Dickinson
  • Cardinal Health, Inc.
  • McKesson Corporation
  • Terumo Corporation
  • Nipro Corporation
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc
  • Sarstedt AG & Co. KG
  • Greiner Holding AG
  • Fresenius Kabi AG
  • Haemonetics Corporation
  • Sol-Millennium Medical Group
Company mentioned

Table of Contents

  • 1. Executive Summary
  • 2. Market Dynamics
  • 2.1. Market Drivers & Opportunities
  • 2.2. Market Restraints & Challenges
  • 2.3. Market Trends
  • 2.4. Supply chain Analysis
  • 2.5. Policy & Regulatory Framework
  • 2.6. Industry Experts Views
  • 3. Research Methodology
  • 3.1. Secondary Research
  • 3.2. Primary Data Collection
  • 3.3. Market Formation & Validation
  • 3.4. Report Writing, Quality Check & Delivery
  • 4. Market Structure
  • 4.1. Market Considerate
  • 4.2. Assumptions
  • 4.3. Limitations
  • 4.4. Abbreviations
  • 4.5. Sources
  • 4.6. Definitions
  • 5. Economic /Demographic Snapshot
  • 6. North America Blood Collection Devices Market Outlook
  • 6.1. Market Size By Value
  • 6.2. Market Share By Country
  • 6.3. Market Size and Forecast, By By Product Type
  • 6.4. Market Size and Forecast, By By End-User
  • 6.5. Market Size and Forecast, By By Application
  • 6.6. Market Size and Forecast, By By Method
  • 6.7. United States Blood Collection Devices Market Outlook
  • 6.7.1. Market Size by Value
  • 6.7.2. Market Size and Forecast By By Product Type
  • 6.7.3. Market Size and Forecast By By End-User
  • 6.7.4. Market Size and Forecast By By Application
  • 6.7.5. Market Size and Forecast By By Method
  • 6.8. Canada Blood Collection Devices Market Outlook
  • 6.8.1. Market Size by Value
  • 6.8.2. Market Size and Forecast By By Product Type
  • 6.8.3. Market Size and Forecast By By End-User
  • 6.8.4. Market Size and Forecast By By Application
  • 6.8.5. Market Size and Forecast By By Method
  • 6.9. Mexico Blood Collection Devices Market Outlook
  • 6.9.1. Market Size by Value
  • 6.9.2. Market Size and Forecast By By Product Type
  • 6.9.3. Market Size and Forecast By By End-User
  • 6.9.4. Market Size and Forecast By By Application
  • 6.9.5. Market Size and Forecast By By Method
  • 7. Competitive Landscape
  • 7.1. Competitive Dashboard
  • 7.2. Business Strategies Adopted by Key Players
  • 7.3. Porter's Five Forces
  • 7.4. Company Profile
  • 7.4.1. BD
  • 7.4.1.1. Company Snapshot
  • 7.4.1.2. Company Overview
  • 7.4.1.3. Financial Highlights
  • 7.4.1.4. Geographic Insights
  • 7.4.1.5. Business Segment & Performance
  • 7.4.1.6. Product Portfolio
  • 7.4.1.7. Key Executives
  • 7.4.1.8. Strategic Moves & Developments
  • 7.4.2. Terumo Corporation
  • 7.4.3. Cardinal Health
  • 7.4.4. Greiner Bio-One International GmbH
  • 7.4.5. Fresenius Kabi AG
  • 7.4.6. Haemonetics Corporation
  • 7.4.7. McKesson Corporation
  • 7.4.8. Medline Industries LP
  • 7.4.9. Nipro Corporation
  • 7.4.10. Sarstedt AG & Co. KG
  • 7.4.11. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
  • 7.4.12. Sol-Millennium Medical Group
  • 8. Strategic Recommendations
  • 9. Annexure
  • 9.1. FAQ`s
  • 9.2. Notes
  • 10. Disclaimer

Table 1: Influencing Factors for Blood Collection Devices Market, 2025
Table 2: Top 10 Counties Economic Snapshot 2024
Table 3: Economic Snapshot of Other Prominent Countries 2022
Table 4: Average Exchange Rates for Converting Foreign Currencies into U.S. Dollars
Table 5: North America Blood Collection Devices Market Size and Forecast, By By Product Type (2020 to 2031F) (In USD Billion)
Table 6: North America Blood Collection Devices Market Size and Forecast, By By End-User (2020 to 2031F) (In USD Billion)
Table 7: North America Blood Collection Devices Market Size and Forecast, By By Application (2020 to 2031F) (In USD Billion)
Table 8: North America Blood Collection Devices Market Size and Forecast, By By Method (2020 to 2031F) (In USD Billion)
Table 9: United States Blood Collection Devices Market Size and Forecast By By Product Type (2020 to 2031F) (In USD Billion)
Table 10: United States Blood Collection Devices Market Size and Forecast By By End-User (2020 to 2031F) (In USD Billion)
Table 11: United States Blood Collection Devices Market Size and Forecast By By Application (2020 to 2031F) (In USD Billion)
Table 12: United States Blood Collection Devices Market Size and Forecast By By Method (2020 to 2031F) (In USD Billion)
Table 13: Canada Blood Collection Devices Market Size and Forecast By By Product Type (2020 to 2031F) (In USD Billion)
Table 14: Canada Blood Collection Devices Market Size and Forecast By By End-User (2020 to 2031F) (In USD Billion)
Table 15: Canada Blood Collection Devices Market Size and Forecast By By Application (2020 to 2031F) (In USD Billion)
Table 16: Canada Blood Collection Devices Market Size and Forecast By By Method (2020 to 2031F) (In USD Billion)
Table 17: Mexico Blood Collection Devices Market Size and Forecast By By Product Type (2020 to 2031F) (In USD Billion)
Table 18: Mexico Blood Collection Devices Market Size and Forecast By By End-User (2020 to 2031F) (In USD Billion)
Table 19: Mexico Blood Collection Devices Market Size and Forecast By By Application (2020 to 2031F) (In USD Billion)
Table 20: Mexico Blood Collection Devices Market Size and Forecast By By Method (2020 to 2031F) (In USD Billion)
Table 21: Competitive Dashboard of top 5 players, 2025

Figure 1: North America Blood Collection Devices Market Size By Value (2020, 2025 & 2031F) (in USD Billion)
Figure 2: North America Blood Collection Devices Market Share By Country (2025)
Figure 3: United States Blood Collection Devices Market Size By Value (2020, 2025 & 2031F) (in USD Billion)
Figure 4: Canada Blood Collection Devices Market Size By Value (2020, 2025 & 2031F) (in USD Billion)
Figure 5: Mexico Blood Collection Devices Market Size By Value (2020, 2025 & 2031F) (in USD Billion)
Figure 6: Porter's Five Forces of Global Blood Collection Devices Market

Blood Collection Devices Market Research FAQs

Blood collection tubes are widely used because different tube types preserve specific specimen conditions required for hematology, chemistry, coagulation, and other laboratory tests.

Manual collection remains essential because trained healthcare professionals still perform most routine venous and capillary blood draws, even when automated laboratory systems are used afterward.

These facilities conduct routine diagnostics, emergency care, surgeries, and patient monitoring, creating frequent requirements for reliable blood specimen collection.

Blood specimens support a wide range of diagnostic tests, making accurate collection and preservation essential for identifying and monitoring diseases and clinical conditions.
Logo

North America Blood Collection Devices Market Outlook, 2031

ChatGPT Summarize Gemini Summarize Perplexity AI Summarize Grok AI Summarize Claude Summarize

Contact usWe are friendly and approachable, give us a call.